By Ross Todd | September 10, 2019
The Jane Doe plaintiff's lawyer at Sanford Heisler Sharp called the subpoena for documents from her new employer "redolent of an improper purpose" and wrote that "a plaintiff does not expose her current job record to carte blanche scrutiny merely by filing suit against her prior employer."
The Recorder | Analysis|Expert Opinion
By Esha Bandyopadhyay, Matthew Berntsen and Meaghan Annett | July 17, 2019
While the anti-SLAPP laws in some states have not had significant impact, others offer a pathway to early dismissal.
By Jenna Greene | June 26, 2019
'The deposition appears to have been a colossal waste of time and resources,' the Delaware Supreme Court wrote in a 20-page addendum detailing the misconduct of Tony award-winning producer Carole Shorenstein Hays.
By Nicole Clark, Trellis | June 25, 2019
During its initial drafting, many of public reviewers of the Electronic Discovery Act expressed concerns that the proposed legislation would overburden the courts and litigants with motions for protective orders. In practice, the results are mixed.
By Victoria Hudgins | June 6, 2019
E-discovery companies say in the past two to three years they've noticed a sizable increase in corporate clients leveraging their platforms to investigate workplace harassment.
By Amanda Bronstad | April 15, 2019
In a motion filed this month, Apple alleged there had been a 'blatant and very serious violation' of a protective order and said principals in Cotchett Pitre should be blocked from viewing confidential documents.
By Ross Todd | March 16, 2019
A California state court judge found that a litigation opponent of the social media giant had "utilized the services of counsel to aid in committing a crime or fraud" when handing over confidential documents to British Parliament and journalists.
By Victoria Hudgins | February 22, 2019
The Sedona Conference recently updated its social media primer to include new guidance and observations about the challenges of social media discovery.
By Jennifer Teaford | February 21, 2019
In its most recent published case, the appellate branch of the State Bar Court of California (the review department) agreed with the hearing department's findings and legal conclusions. Despite finding no error or abuse of discretion, the review department elected to recommend a significantly shorter suspension than the hearing department pursuant to its powerful independent review authority.
By Ross Todd | February 14, 2019
Defense firms and companies claim that the requirement to meet and confer over the identity of corporate representatives for 30(b)(6) depositions will lead to unnecessary fights.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an associate to joins its Commercial Litigation practice in our Columbus or Cincinnati offices. Ca...
McCarter & English, LLP, a well established and growing law firm, is actively seeking a talented and driven associate having 2-5 years o...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS