OAKLAND — Ten years of antitrust litigation against Apple Inc. ended in a complete bust for plaintiffs lawyers at Robbins Geller Rudman & Geller on Tuesday, when jurors returned a verdict siding with the company after just three hours of deliberation.

A jury in Oakland federal court unanimously determined a 2006 iTunes update was a product improvement, not just a way for Apple to maintain control over the MP3 music player market. The update blocked iPods from playing music bought from music stores that competed with iTunes, but it also added features Apple argued were obvious improvements—including a higher resolution screen, the ability to watch movies, and an auto-syncing feature. Apple’s lawyers, led by William Isaacson and Karen Dunn of Boies, Schiller & Flexner, also argued the update fixed security holes.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]