There is evidence Latham & Watkins pursued a trade secrets case that lawyers knew had no merit, wrote Presiding Justice Joan Dempsey Klein.
August 27, 2014 at 06:49 PM
1 minute read
SAN FRANCISCO — Latham & Watkins is back on the hook for a malicious prosecution claim, after a state appellate panel ruled it’s likely the firm’s attorneys filed a trade secrets suit they knew had no merit.
Two former employees of FLIR Systems and Indigo Systems Corp. went after Latham for malicious prosecution in 2012, after defeating a trade secrets suit prosecuted by Latham partner Daniel Schecter.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
