The landmark ruling does not relieve attorneys from an obligation to "fully" disclose an arbitration clause to clients, Ninth Circuit Judge William Fletcher wrote for a unanimous panel.
December 12, 2013 at 05:35 PM
1 minute read
SAN FRANCISCO — The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2011 blockbuster AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion has helped telecom companies, financial institutions, nursing homes and others force more cases into arbitration.
But it may not have the same benefit for lawyers facing suits by their clients, at least within the Ninth Circuit.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
