The Fourth District Court of Appeal said a jury should decide whether extraneous language in a disclosure about pre-hire background checks amounted to a willful violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
April 19, 2022 at 07:12 PM
3 minute read
A state appellate court on Tuesday reinstated a putative class action against Barnes & Noble, finding a jury could reasonably determine the bookseller willfully violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
The unanimous three-justice panel reversed a ruling by San Diego County Superior Court Judge Gregory Pollack that granted Barnes & Noble’s request for summary judgment.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Barnes & Noble in Baltimore, Maryland. August 22, 2020. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
