Companies using otherwise generic terms for their websites are eligible for trademark protection if the domain is distinct to the general public, according to the U.S. Supreme Court, which struck down a broad federal rule that blocked Booking.com from registering its mark.

While the term “booking” on its own, like countless other one-word phrases, is generic and ineligible for trademark protection, Booking.com has taken on a secondary meaning with the public, wrote Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg for the majority. The justices noted that upholding the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s application of the rule would strike down trademarks it already granted to Dating.com and Art.com.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]