California Eases Layoff Rules as Businesses Reel From COVID-19 Pandemic
The governor gave the state Labor and Workforce Development Agency until March 23 to issue guidance for companies on complying with the executive order.
March 18, 2020 at 06:42 PM
3 minute read
Gov. Gavin Newsom has signed an executive order freeing employers from some state restrictions governing mass layoffs and employee relocations in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The action temporarily suspends requirements that businesses that have employed 75 or more full- and part-time employees in the 12 months give 60 days warning that they plan to terminate a large number of workers. The order instead requires businesses hurt by coronavirus-related conditions to give "as much notice as is practicable" and to tell laid-off and furloughed employees that they may qualify for unemployment insurance.
The move is "a big deal for employers who are … forced to lay off at least 50 employees or cease operations," David Reis, head of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer's labor and employment practice group, said Wednesday.
"This executive order will allow them to avoid paying the statutory and civil penalties that would otherwise follow from a shut down or mass layoff where the employer doesn't provide at least 60 days' notice," Reis said. "Many employers were worried about the uncertainty over whether they would risk having to pay 60 days' wages as a penalty under Cal-WARN if they had to shut down or conduct a mass layoff."
The changes, in effect during the declared coronavirus emergency, align the state's layoff-alert law more closely with the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, better known as the WARN Act.
The governor gave the state Labor and Workforce Development Agency until March 23 to issue guidance for companies on complying with the executive order.
Newsom signed the order as companies in the retail, restaurant, travel and hospitality industries reel from widespread shelter-in-place orders around the state and general guidance by health authorities for the public to avoid gatherings.
A survey released Tuesday by NPR, PBS Newshour and Marist of 835 working adults in the United States found that 18% reported losing work hours or being laid off due to the coronavirus. Thousands of employees are facing reduced shifts or being laid off across industries, as companies respond to reduced demand, according to a new Wall Street Journal report.
"Many, many companies will be impacted," said Mandana Massoumi, who leads Manatt, Phelps & Phillips' retail and consumer products practice. "A lot of organizations are reassessing options as they consider the new reality."
Late Wednesday, the U.S. Senate passed a $104 billion package that includes boosts to unemployment insurance. Last week, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-California, introduced legislation "prohibiting employers from firing, punishing or otherwise discriminating against a worker who is quarantined or isolated."
More than two dozen cities, states and U.S. territories have some version of a layoff notification law. Those are now under scrutiny by many jurisdictions.
"Quite frankly we see developments happening on an hourly basis," Massoumi said. "This is a fast-moving topic that is changing and is being modified. These are truly unprecedented times."
Read more:
In Criminal Trial, a Call for COVID-19 Tests to Protect Defendant and His Lawyers
9th Circuit Shuts Down Public Access to Courthouses
How COVID-19 Is Impacting California Courts: Roundup of Services
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Effective Remedy'?: DOJ Unveils Corrective Action Plan in Google Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readMango Labs Sues Ex-Employees for Over $10M After 'Egregious' Governance Nightmare
4 minute read'The Most Peculiar Federal Court in the Country' Comes to Berkeley Law
What Judicial Nominations Could Look Like Under a President Harris or Trump
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft and Pryor Cashman have entered appearances for Diageo Americas Supply d/b/a Ciroc Distilling Co. and Sony Songs, a division of Sony Music Publishing, respectively, in a pending lawsuit. The case was filed Sept. 10 in New York Southern District Court by the Bloom Firm and IP Legal Studio on behalf of Dawn Angelique Richard. The plaintiff, who performed as a member of producer Sean 'Diddy' Combs girl group Danity Kane and later his band, Diddy - Dirty Money, claims that she was financially exploited by Combs and subjected to inhumane working conditions. Among other violations, Richard claims that Combs required group members to remain at his residences and studios, deprived them of adequate food and sleep and forced them to rehearse for 36 to 48 hours without breaks. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla, is 1:24-cv-06848, Richard v. Combs et al.
Who Got The Work
Mathilda McGee-Tubb and Kevin M. McGinty of Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, as well as Jesse W. Belcher-Timme of Doherty, Wallace, Pillsbury & Murphy, have stepped in to defend Peter Pan Bus Lines in a pending consumer class action. The suit, filed Sept. 4 in Massachusetts District Court by Hackett Feinberg PC and KalielGold PLLC, accuses the defendant of charging undisclosed 'junk fees' on top of ticket prices during checkout. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Mark G. Mastroianni, is 3:24-cv-12277, Mulani et al v. Peter Pan Bus Lines, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250