Christopher Adams alleged that former investment partners transferred assets to new companies while cutting him out. But he wasn't the right person to testify about the new companies' valuations, the Second District held.
December 31, 2019 at 04:56 PM
1 minute read
MIchael Tu of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe (courtesy photo)
Christopher Adams has had two chances to prove that former investment partners owe him $62 million. Thanks to Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, he isn’t going to get a third.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
