Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Seth Sproul, left, and Tucker Terhufen, right, with Fish & Richardson. Seth Sproul, left, and Tucker Terhufen, right, with Fish & Richardson.

In Part 1 of this article, we looked at the history of California Code of Civil Procedure §2019.210, the statutory framework unique among state and federal trade secret laws that requires trade secret plaintiffs to identify the misappropriated trade secrets before discovery commences. We also examined one of the three cases—Advanced Modular Sputtering—that provide some guidance on what is required in a trade secret identification. In Part 2, we look at the two other cases and the application of §2019.210.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2019 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.