Fenwick Goes Gender-Neutral on New Parent Benefits and Boosts Paid Leave
New mothers at Fenwick & West can now take as much as 29 weeks of paid time off, and any attorney or staffer can take 16 weeks regardless of gender or caregiver status.
November 05, 2018 at 03:40 PM
3 minute read
Another Am Law 100 firm is making dramatic changes to its parental leave policy.
On Nov. 2, Fenwick & West announced it is expanding its parental leave policy to 16 weeks of paid leave for its attorneys and professional staff, regardless of gender or caregiver status.
Birthing mothers at the firm will now also receive 22 weeks of paid leave—a combination of the 16 weeks parental bonding time plus at least six weeks of fully paid pregnancy disability leave. Depending on the timing of the pregnancy-related disability, the amount of paid leave could be as high as 29 weeks.
“When I grew up as an associate, you would hear these stories about how some women would give birth one day and be back in the office the next day or two days later, and that's just not the time we live in anymore,” said Fenwick managing partner Rodger Cole.
“We wanted to give our people the time—and make it very clear that the firm supports them taking the time—and we feel that's better for their long-term health personally and will, no pun intended, bond them to the firm as well,” he added.
Previously, birthing parents were given 18 weeks of paid leave at Fenwick, and paid leave for non-birthing parents varied. Non-primary caregivers were given six weeks of leave, while primary caregivers were given 12 weeks.
Now, like several other law firms, the Mountain View, California-based firm has removed the caregiver distinction and made its policy gender neutral.
Part of Fenwick's rationale for the change was to support the firms LGBT community, which has steadily increased over time. But it was also generational.
“We recognize that for this generation, it's just as important to all genders to spend time with their new kids,” Cole said.
In addition to the updated policies, Fenwick also has a network of support programs to assist new parents in their return back to work.
The firm partners with an outside provider to offer access to parenting and family therapist services and career consultants. It also has a transition mentorship program that allows mothers to select a mentor to support them before, during and after their leave, as well as a parents affinity group. Fenwick also offers several flexible work options, including a reintegration program that allows associates returning from leave to work on a reduced schedule.
All of these programs reinforce the firm's commitment to having its attorneys and staff actually take advantage of its parental leave policies, which are among the most generous for a Big Law firm, Cole said.
In recent months a bevy of law firms have updated their leave policies to create more inclusive programs for their attorneys and staff.
Last month Dechert announced that it would no longer distinguish between primary and secondary caregivers with a new policy that offers at least 12 weeks of paid leave for all of its U.S. employees—both lawyers and business service professionals. Susman Godfrey announced it would provide unlimited paid parental leave to its associates, regardless of gender or caregiver status.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllO'Melveny Secures Global Clearances for Korean Air-Asiana Merger
Coinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readK&L Gates Secures $10.5M Verdict for Washington Meat Retailer in Lawsuit Over 'Boneless' Chicken Product
As AI-Generated Fraud Rises, Financial Companies Face a Long Cybersecurity Battle
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: The Recorder and Law.com's California Legal Awards 2025
- 2The Week in Data Dec. 13: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
- 3Antitrust Class Actions Against CVS, Other Pharmacy Benefit Managers Are Piling Up
- 4Judge Grinds NY's Cannabis Licensing Regime to a Halt Again
- 5On the Move and After Hours: Barclay Damon; VLJ; Barnes & Thornburg
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250