9th Cir.;
16-16070
The court of appeals affirmed a district court order. The court held that the scope of an employee arbitration agreement did not encompass the employee’s qui tam complaint under the False Claims Act (FCA).
9th Cir.; 16-16070 The court of appeals affirmed a district court order. The court held that the scope of an employee arbitration agreement did not encompass…
September 12, 2017 at 06:26 PM
1 minute read
9th Cir.;
16-16070
The court of appeals affirmed a district court order. The court held that the scope of an employee arbitration agreement did not encompass the employee’s qui tam complaint under the False Claims Act (FCA).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS