Photo credit: Bigstock
The state is not entitled to subrogation of a workers’ compensation lien claimed in a third-party settlement agreement stemming from a case involving a former employee of the Attorney General's Office, the Commonwealth Court has ruled.
April 05, 2018 at 02:55 PM
1 minute read
The state is not entitled to subrogation of a workers’ compensation lien claimed in a third-party settlement agreement stemming from a case involving a former employee of the Attorney General’s Office, the Commonwealth Court has ruled.
A three-judge panel consisting of Judges Renée Cohn Jubelirer, P. Kevin Brobson and Dan Pellegrini upheld the Workers’ Compensation Review Board’s ruling declining to grant subrogation to the state.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
