Trial courts struggling with how to apportion liability against defendants in strict liability cases were given guidance Thursday when the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled judges should not simply divide liability equally among defendants.

A three-judge panel of the court determined in Roverano v. John Crane Inc. that the Fair Share Act, which made it so defendants are only responsible to pay for the percent they are found liable, applies to asbestos litigation. The ruling rejected arguments that the act did not apply to strict liability claims for the purposes of apportioning liability.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]