In this slip-and-fall case, plaintiff failed to show that defendant breached a duty to her in not warning her of a dangerous condition on the premises, so the court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant.
September 29, 2017 at 01:50 PM
1 minute read
Slip-and-Fall • Proximate Cause • Failure to Warn • Dangerous Latent Condition
Weinzettle v. Atlantic Dev. Corp. of Pa., PICS Case No. 17-1421 (C.P. Adams Sep. 5, 2017) Campbell, J. (7 pages).
In this slip-and-fall case, plaintiff failed to show that defendant breached a duty to her in not warning her of a dangerous condition on the premises, so the court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
