HEALTH CARE LAW
Filial Support Laws • Conflict of Law • Choice of Law • Quantum Meruit • Adult Indigent Child
Melmark v. Schutt, PICS Case No. 17-1373 (Pa. Super. Aug. 21, 2017) Stevens, P. J. (37 pages).
Trial court properly held that elderly parents had no legal obligation to pay for their severely autistic adult son's care in appellant's Pennsylvania facility after New Jersey department of disabilities ceased paying because the services were not rendered to parents personally, they never contracted to pay for the services, New Jersey had the most significant contacts in the controversy and the New Jersey filial support law applied, and parents experienced no personal enrichment so appellant's quantum meruit claim failed. Affirmed.
September 19, 2017 at 09:29 AM
1 minute read
HEALTH CARE LAW
Filial Support Laws • Conflict of Law • Choice of Law • Quantum Meruit • Adult Indigent Child
Melmark v. Schutt, PICS Case No. 17-1373 (Pa. Super. Aug. 21, 2017) Stevens, P. J. (37 pages).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS