The trial court did not err in denying wife's petition seeking to invalidate the parties' property settlement agreement as its properly chose to adhere to its prior rulings and barred wife from seeking to invalidate an agreement she had successfully enforced. The court affirmed a trial court order denying wife relief.
September 01, 2017 at 01:27 PM
1 minute read
Divorce Decree • Settlement Agreement • Validity • Equitable Estoppel
Bienert v. Bienert, PICS Case No. 17-1288 (Pa. Super. Aug. 7, 2017) Solano, J. (15 pages).
The trial court did not err in denying wife’s petition seeking to invalidate the parties’ property settlement agreement as its properly chose to adhere to its prior rulings and barred wife from seeking to invalidate an agreement she had successfully enforced. The court affirmed a trial court order denying wife relief.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
