Search Results

0 results for 'Petrucci'

You can use to get even better search results
October 11, 2007 | The Legal Intelligencer

Commonwealth Case Brings Expansion of Injury Law Full Circle

In Cinram Manufacturing Inc. v. W.C.A.B. (Hill), decided by the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania last month, the law regarding the expansion of an accepted description of injury has come full circle.
6 minute read
September 24, 2012 | The Legal Intelligencer

People in the News

Lisa Jacobs, a partner with DLA Piper, was appointed a member of the drafting committee on series of unincorporated business entities by the Uniform Law Commission.
3 minute read
August 11, 2005 | The Legal Intelligencer

Commonwealth Court Sets Chilling Precedent Regarding Utilization Reviews

As practitioners of workers' compensation are aware, in 1993, the General Assembly enacted Act 44, an amendment to the Workers' Compensation Act, which sought to substantially control medical costs associated with work-related care.
5 minute read
May 22, 2006 | The Legal Intelligencer

No Limits?

The Workers' Compensation Act has always provided for the payment of reasonable surgical and medical services, treatment rendered by physicians or other health care providers as well as medicines and supplies. Nothing short of a termination of benefits du
6 minute read
August 14, 2009 | The Legal Intelligencer

High Court Affirms Cinram Regarding Amendment of Description of Injury

Back in 2007, the Commonwealth Court case of Cinram Manufacturing Inc. v. W.C.A.B. (Hill) held that a workers' compensation judge, or WCJ, did not err in expanding the claimant's accepted work injury from a lumbar strain to a herniated disc during the pendency of a termination petition, despite the fact that the claimant never filed a review petition seeking to expand the injury. Given that Cinram seemed to be at odds with the Supreme Court's holding in Jeanes Hospital v. W.C.A.B. (Hass) , which was the seminal case dealing with an amendment to the accepted description of injury, the court granted the employer's petition for allowance of appeal from the order of the Commonwealth Court. Last month, the Supreme Court upheld Cinram , thereby putting the issue to rest. Its implications are significant and represent an unequivocal victory for injured workers.
7 minute read
May 19, 2008 | The Legal Intelligencer

A Victory for Workers

On April 28, 2008, the Commonwealth Court afforded injured workers a substantial victory in its decision, Diehl v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (IA Construction and Liberty Mutual Insurance).
5 minute read
September 14, 2006 | The Legal Intelligencer

The Relevance of Cooper v. Schoffstall in the Workers' Comp Forum

In the state Supreme Court case of Cooper v. Schoffstall, the court addressed a lingering issue that rears its head on a daily basis in the average workers' compensation practice. While the case does not stem from a workers' compensation claim, or the Commonwealth Court for that matter, it probably has more relevance in the workers' compensation forum than in other areas of civil litigation. Cooper concerns the availability, in a civil case, of the discovery of financial records of a nonparty expert medical
7 minute read
September 01, 2010 | The Legal Intelligencer

7th Circuit: Racial Preferences Can't Determine Work Assignments

Brenda Chaney, a certified nursing assistant, claims in a lawsuit that she was restricted from helping a patient in need because her employer enforced a racial preference policy that prevented Chaney from helping the patient because of the color of her skin.
7 minute read
May 17, 2005 | The Legal Intelligencer

News in Brief

The criminal case stemming from the collapse of Pier 34 that killed three and injured dozens arrived at the Pennsylvania Supreme Court yesterday two days shy of the tragedy's five-year anniversary.
4 minute read
July 17, 2003 | The Legal Intelligencer

Veteran Who Sought Shift Change Entitled to Workers' Compensation

A Vietnam War veteran who cannot work rotating shifts due to post-traumatic stress disorder is entitled to workers' compensation benefits, an en banc panel of the Commonwealth Court has ruled. The court, in Zink v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Graphic Packaging Inc.) concluded that, given the context of his specific employment, Graphic Packaging's companywide switch to a rotating shift system substantiated George Zink's claim that his mental condition was aggravated by abnormal working conditions.
6 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • 7 Proven Strategies for Implementing a Workers' Comp Cloud Platform

      Brought to you by Origami Risk

      Download Now

    • Maximizing Liquidity and Loan Growth: A Credit Union's Success Story

      Brought to you by Upstart

      Download Now

    • Candid Conversations: Couples, Money & Conflict

      Brought to you by eMoney Advisor

      Download Now