The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Joseph Cardile and Jeffrey T. Criswell | February 8, 2018
On Nov. 21, 2017, ride-sharing giant, Uber, issued a press release stating that it had fallen victim to a cyberattack in late 2016.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Barbara Melby and Eric J. Pennesi | February 6, 2018
With technology being the ultimate enabler across the majority of industries, commercially available “off the shelf” software products have become the lifeline of many businesses.
By Randy Maniloff | January 31, 2018
What better way to deal with any lull in the action on Sunday than a discussion of the substantial number of lawsuits that surround the National Football League, its players and fans.
By The Legal Intelligencer | January 30, 2018
In the Legal's Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action supplement, read about company-generated documents and emails, navigating choppy waters…
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Zack Needles | December 13, 2017
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has agreed to review whether the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission's record-high fine against an energy distribution company that allegedly overcharged customers during the 2014 polar vortex was impermissibly excessive.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Hillary Weinstein | November 1, 2017
Imagine a car service company that tracks its customers' movements, posts them on a public website, and markets the information in the name of “public safety.”
By Celia Ampel | Daily Business Review | October 19, 2017
The settlement benefits the attorneys general of 49 states and the District of Columbia.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Max Mitchell | October 11, 2017
Chris Seeger, one of the lawyers leading class counsel in the settlement has made a $70 million fee request on behalf of his firm, Seeger Weiss, which he outlined Tuesday in a 22-page declaration to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
By P.J. D'Annunzio | October 2, 2017
Vitamin and supplement chain GNC escaped a potential class action over the abrupt discontinuation of its Gold Card customer discount program.
By thelegalintelligencer | The Legal Intelligencer | September 22, 2017
Trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting summary judgment in favor of home building company in homeowner's UTPCPL claim over allegedly defective stucco because owner was not in privity with company and failed to establish that company made any representations about her specific home or the stucco upon which she could justifiably rely. Affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
We are seeking an associate to join our Employee Benefits practice. Candidates should have three to six years of employee benefits experienc...
Associate attorney position at NJ Immigration Law firm: Leschak & Associates, LLC, based in Freehold, NJ, is looking for a full time ass...
Duane Morris LLP has an immediate opening for a senior level, highly motivated litigation associate to join its dynamic and growing Employme...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS