Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
1,200 results for '* industry:"Real Estate"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-05-17
Practice Area: Tax
Industry:
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Wallace
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 168 C.D. 2023
Tax bureau failed to comply with notice requirements of the Real Estate Tax Sale Law by not undertaking reasonable efforts to locate the property's owner after the upset sale notice was returned undelivered. Order of the trial court reversed.
Publication Date: 2024-05-17
Practice Area: Tax
Industry:
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Covey
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 135 C.D. 2020
Trial court erred in denying nunc pro tunc relief to appellants in their challenge to their 2019 property assessment because Board of Revision of Taxes was negligent in not mailing appellants notice of the reassessment and appellants filed an appeal with BRT as soon as they received their 2019 tax bill, which was the first time they received notice that their property had been reassessed. Reversed.
Publication Date: 2024-05-17
Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
Industry: Energy | Real Estate | State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
Judge: Judge Carlucci
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: CV 23-01204
Appellant solar farm developer appealed appellee township's denial of its application for a conditional use permit. The court sustained the appeal, holding that appellant was entitled to a deemed approval of its conditional use application where appellee rendered a final written decision more than 45 days after the extended date on which the parties expressly agreed that the evidentiary record would close.
Publication Date: 2024-05-17
Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
Industry: Real Estate | State and Local Government
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Baylson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-4287
Challenge to local use and occupancy ordinance failed where plaintiff did not suffer a due process violation and where the ordinance had been amended to comply with state law and thus was not preempted. Defendants' motion to dismiss granted.
Publication Date: 2024-05-17
Practice Area: Landlord Tenant Law
Industry: Hospitality and Lodging | Real Estate
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Coyle
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 00699
Defendant tenant appealed the court's order denying his motion to reinstate his appeal of a municipal court order denying his petition to open default judgment. The court concluded that its order should be affirmed where defendant failed to timely file pleadings below, mistakenly or intentionally misrepresented filing dates to the court, and offered no meritorious legal arguments that would warrant reinstating his appeal.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Michael R. Griffinger, Paul F. Cullum III
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2024-05-17
Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
Industry: Real Estate | State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Roberts
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1078 CD 2023
City and city councilman appealed the court's denial of their appeal of a decision of city's zoning board of adjustment that granted property owner's application for a commercial property use permit. The court requested that its decision be affirmed where Board's decision was supported by substantial evidence that the approved variance was properly limited in scope for a unique property and would not result in adverse impacts.
Publication Date: 2024-05-17
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Keogh
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1104
In a §1925(a) opinion, the court urged the Superior Court to quash the appeal of a "Part 2" partition decision as untimely or alternatively affirm the court's Dec. 26, 2023, order because neither party preserved any issues for appellate review.
Publication Date: 2024-05-10
Practice Area: Real Estate
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Fox
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 190 EDA 2024
The court urged the Superior Court to affirm its order that ruled on exceptions to a Master's Report that determined the fair market value of a residence owned by the parties and other issues that were not appealable as a final order.
Publication Date: 2024-05-10
Practice Area: Real Estate
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Monroe County
Judge: Judge Williamson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 004957-CV-2015
Plaintiff sought partition of real property that she owned with defendant. The court ordered the property partitioned, calculated the amounts owed between the parties in light of credits based upon amounts paid and the property's fair rental value for pertinent periods, and set out proper disbursement amounts for any sale proceeds, depending upon the parties' intentions for the property's final disposition.
Publication Date: 2024-05-10
Practice Area: Real Estate
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge Mellon
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2021-02831
The court's §1925(a) opinion urged affirmance of its Oct. 11, 2023 order denying post-trial relief and its October 17, 2023 order and judgment in favor of plaintiff whose vacant commercial lot was subject to a deliberate water intrusion by defendants from their adjacent property which was uphill to the plaintiff's property.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read