• Murphy v. Le Sportsac, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2023-02-13
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry: Consumer Products | E-Commerce
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Western
    Judge: District Judge Lanzillo
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 1:22-CV-00058-RAL

    Court approved class certification and proposed class settlement in ADA action where settlement sought to bring defendant's website in line with current industry standards for accessibility for blind and visually impaired users, rendering the settlement reasonable as it would resolve any harm suffered by the putative class. Plaintiff's motion for class certification and preliminary approval of class settlement granted.

  • Murphy v. Eyebobs, LLC

    Publication Date: 2021-10-25
    Practice Area: Class Actions
    Industry: E-Commerce
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Western
    Judge: District Judge Lanzillo
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 21-1238

    Plaintiff moved for certification of the proposed class in his putative class action asserting defendant's online store was not fully accessible to visually disabled persons in violation of the ADA and for approval of the proposed settlement which committed defendant to ensuring visually disabled individual had "full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations provided by and through its Digital Properties." Motion granted.

  • Williams v. Clark

    Publication Date: 2020-01-20
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Western
    Judge: District Judge Lanzillo
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 20-0050

    Defendants moved for summary judgment in plaintiff's §1983 action against corrections officer and DOC employees and court found plaintiff failed to establish a viable constitutional claim against officer for any claims except the allegedly false and retaliatory misconduct charge. Motion granted in part and denied in part.