Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
1,674 results for '* court:"U S District Court for Pennsylvania Eastern"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-03-15
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Education
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Wolson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2:23-cv-04433-JDW
Court declined plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously to prevent his current employer from learning of his chronic health condition, where plaintiff's claimed fears were largely economic in nature and required the unreasonable assumption that plaintiff's employer would break the law by terminating him due to his disability. Plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously and seal the record denied.
Publication Date: 2024-03-15
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry: Hospitality and Lodging
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Leeson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 5:23-cv-2261
Defendant landlord moved to dismiss plaintiff tenant's discrimination and retaliation claims based on disability, failure to accommodate and the Fair Housing Act and court found plaintiff offered little more than conclusory allegations, apartment complex was not a place of public accommodation within the Americans with Disabilities Act and court dismissed the ADA claims with prejudice and granted leave to amend the FHA claims. Motion granted.
Publication Date: 2024-03-15
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Wolson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2:23-cv-00164-JDW
Defendant moved for summary judgment in plaintiff's Title VII, Americans with Disabilities Act and Pennsylvania Human Relations action over his termination for refusing a COVID-19 vaccination and court found plaintiff provided no evidence that his decision to not get vaccinated was borne of religious belief or that defendant discriminated against him when it fired him. Motion granted.
Publication Date: 2024-03-08
Practice Area: Expert Witnesses
Industry: Entertainment and Leisure
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Beetlestone
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-2941
Defendants moved to strike plaintiffs' expert witness report and testimony regarding the extent to which plaintiffs suffered trauma from alleged racial discrimination experienced at defendants' property. The court granted in part and denied in part defendants' motion to strike, concluding the expert's reasoning, in light of the testing that he performed, did not allow him to testify that the trauma symptoms he observed in individual plaintiffs were linked to the alleged discrimination that took place at defendants' park.
Publication Date: 2024-03-08
Practice Area: Health Care Law
Industry: Federal Government | Health Care | State and Local Government
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Savage
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-3277
Defendants moved to certify on interlocutory appeal a question as to the application of the first-to-file doctrine in a qui tam action and court found there was no controlling question of law. Motion denied.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Jonathan H. Lomurro, Gary L. Riveles, Abbott S. Brown
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2024-03-08
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Health Care | Software
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Scott
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-3778
Defendant moved to dismiss plaintiffs' action alleging defamation, breach of the non-disparagement and property return of provisions of the severance agreement, intentional infliction of emotional distress and violations of the Pennsylvania Uniform Trade Secrets Act, the Federal Defense of Trade Secrets Act and the Lanham Act and court found defendant's post on a job website was not commercial speech under the Lanham act but there were genuine issues of material fact in dispute as to all of plaintiffs' other claims. Motion denied in p
Publication Date: 2024-03-01
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Scott
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-0263
Court erred in dismissing religious failure to accommodate claim where employee presented prima facie evidence that she had a religiously connected, sincerely held objection to receiving COVID-19 vaccines. Defendant's motion for summary judgment denied in part and granted in part.
Publication Date: 2024-03-01
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Surrick
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-460
Defendant moved to dismiss plaintiff's employment discrimination complaint. The court granted in part and denied in part defendant's motion, concluding in pertinent part that plaintiff stated a claim for sexual orientation discrimination in violation of federal and state law, but failed to allege claims for discrimination on the basis of sex or disability.
Publication Date: 2024-03-01
Practice Area: Class Actions
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Pappert
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 204318
Plaintiffs moved for approval of the settlement in plaintiffs' class action asserting defendant violated Pennsylvania law by using deficient disclosure notices and practices in repossessing plaintiffs' vehicles and court found the Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(e)(2) and Girsh factors supported the settlement, the distribution was fair, reasonable and adequate as was the attorney fee and named plaintiff incentive awards. Motion granted.
Publication Date: 2024-03-01
Practice Area: Business Torts
Industry: Consumer Products
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Sanchez
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-3984
Plaintiff brought a shareholder derivative action against defendants for usurpation of corporate opportunity and related claims. The court found in favor of plaintiff upon trial, concluding plaintiff's son, as majority shareholder in the family business, usurped corporate opportunity and breached his fiduciary duties by unilaterally diverting a project from the family business to his own company.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read