• Doe v. Hand & Stone Franchise Corp.

    Publication Date: 2022-06-20
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
    Judge: Judge Allen
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 22-0583

    Although the inquiry notice approach to statutes of limitations could be perceived as harsh as applied in this personal injury case involving a sexual assault, the court could not provide plaintiff with relief where she failed to file her suit within two years of her inquiry notice of the assault and resulting injuries. The court recommended affirmance.

  • Russell v. Educ. Comm'n for Foreign Med. Graduates

    Publication Date: 2022-06-06
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry: Health Care
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
    Judge: District Judge Wolson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 22-0628

    Defendant commission that certified international medical graduates moved for summary judgment in plaintiff patients' putative class action for negligent infliction of emotional distress after they learned individual had used fraudulent documents to be certified, complete a medical residency and practice medicine and court found patients' emotional distress occurred after the physical impact and Pennsylvania did not recognize such a claim.

  • Jordan v. The Pennsylvania State Univ.

    Publication Date: 2022-05-23
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry: Education | Health Care
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Stevens
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 22-0565

    Appellant appealed order sustaining the preliminary objections filed by university appellees and granting the petitions filed by healthcare appellees to hold appellant in contempt of court and dismiss his amended complaint in action over appellant's alleged knee injury while a university football player and court found his appeal was procedurally deficient, his motion to recuse was untimely and trial court properly disposed of all of appellant's cognizable issues. Affirmed.

  • Stetts v. Manor Care of Williamsport PA (N.) LLC

    Publication Date: 2022-05-23
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry: Health Care
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
    Judge: Judge Linhardt
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 22-0466

    The court granted defendants summary judgment on plaintiff's corporate negligence claim premised on alleged understaffing of a nursing care facility where the evidence failed to demonstrate, through expert testimony or other evidence, a causal connection between the alleged understaffing and the breach that caused the decedent's injury. The court denied plaintiff's motion for reconsideration.

  • Mertira v. Camelback Lodge & Indoor Waterpark

    Publication Date: 2022-05-16
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry: Food and Beverage | Hospitality and Lodging
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Monroe County
    Judge: Judge Williamson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 22-0412

    Plaintiff could not recover damages for injuries allegedly suffered in a slip and fall accident on defendants' property during winter conditions where there was no dispute that freezing rain and/or snow was falling as she entered defendant's establishment, while she and her family dined there and for several hours after plaintiff fell. The court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Texas Legal Malpractice & Lawyer Discipline 2023

    Authors: Charles F. Herring, JR, Jason M. Panzer, Leah Turner

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Noga v. Wal-Mart Stores E., L.P.

    Publication Date: 2022-05-09
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry: Retail
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
    Judge: Judge Hodge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 22-0413

    Defendant was not entitled to summary relief in this premises liability suit as there was sufficient evidence of record, including a store manager's deposition testimony regarding an alleged crack in the sidewalk where plaintiff fell, for a jury to conclude that a crack in the pavement was the cause of plaintiff's fall. The court denied defendant's motion for summary judgment.

  • Roy v. Rue

    Publication Date: 2022-04-25
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry: Food and Beverage
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Stevens
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 22-0440

    Trial court properly denied defendant's petition to open or strike a default judgment because he failed to show a defect as to the affidavit/return of service of the complaint, the ten-day notice of intent to file a default judgment or notice of the assessment of damages hearing since there was no dispute that residence where his mother accepted service of process was the only address of record for individual and his petition was not timely. Affirmed.

  • Pennock v. Kennett Consol. Sch. Dist.

    Publication Date: 2022-04-18
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry: Education
    Court: Commonwealth Court
    Judge: Judge Cannon
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 22-0427

    Evidence of lack of previous injuries was probative in trip and fall case to show that property owned lacked notice of an alleged defective condition. Judgment of the trial court affirmed.

  • Yoder v. McCarthy Constr., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2022-04-18
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry: Construction
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas
    Judge: Judge Foglietta
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 22-0267

    In this Rule 1925 (a) opinion, the court found no error when it found that plaintiff was an independent contractor, and a video of plaintiff post-accident was not admissible. The court sought affirmance.

  • Gorman v. Shpetrik

    Publication Date: 2022-04-04
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry: E-Commerce
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
    Judge: District Judge Rufe
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 22-0369

    Directing allegedly defamatory messages to a person in a jurisdiction, with the intent to damage the reputation of another person also in that jurisdiction, was sufficient to constitute activity expressly directed at the jurisdiction to support the exercise of personal jurisdiction. Defendant's motion to dismiss denied in part and granted in part.