Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
527 results for '* topic:"Labor Law"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2023-04-24
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Federal Government | Health Care
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Savage
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 17-5434
Defendant moved to dismiss plaintiff's action asserting she was fired in retaliation for bringing a qui tam action under the False Claims Act and court found plaintiff stated a plausible retaliation claim when she asserted she complained to her supervisors that defendant was providing unnecessary therapy services, her complaints put defendant on notice she was investigating a potential FCA claim and she was fired. Motion denied.
Publication Date: 2023-04-10
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Health Care
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Jordan
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-3286
District court properly granted summary judgment in plaintiff's Fair Labor Standards Act action and found defendant employer did not make improper deductions from plaintiff's salaries because the term "salary" as used in the FLSA did not include fringe benefits like paid time off. Affirmed.
Publication Date: 2023-04-03
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Health Care
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Western
Judge: District Judge Horan
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2:22-cv-1190
Defendant moved to dismiss plaintiff's Americans with Disabilities Act, Title VII and §1983 failure to accommodate, discrimination and retaliation claims and court found she failed to sufficiently plead her ADA claims and the title VII gender discrimination claim. Motion granted in part and denied in part.
Publication Date: 2023-04-03
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry:
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Bowes
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1473 MDA 2021
Trial court properly dismissed appellant's action asserting union's promulgation of a schedule of fees in connection with its representation of non-members like appellant in the context of various employment grievances constituted a violation of the duty of fair representation because the mere fact of implementing a fee schedule did not show a violation of the duty of fair representation and appellant failed to show union acted arbitrarily, irrationally or fraudulently. Affirmed.
Publication Date: 2023-04-03
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Automotive | Manufacturing
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Covey
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 680 C.D. 2021
Section 2102 of the Medical Marijuana Act did not preclude a workers' compensation carrier or employer from fulfilling its obligations under the Workers' Compensation Act to reimburse an employee for costs of medical marijuana treatment deemed reasonable and necessary to treat a work injury. Order of the Workers' Compensation Appeal Board reversed and remanded in part.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: SHARI L. KLEVENS, ALANNA G. CLAIR
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2023-04-03
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Middle
Judge: District Judge Mehalchick
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 3:21-CV-01678
Discrimination and harassment claims failed where plaintiff did not plead facts showing that male employees were treated more favorably than female employees or that her termination was motivated in any part by her gender, and where a single incident of physical contact did not rise to the level of severe or pervasive harassment or hostile work environment. Defendant's partial motion to dismiss granted.
Publication Date: 2023-04-03
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Automotive | Insurance
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Covey
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 824 C.D. 2021
The Workers' Compensation Act required employer to reimburse claimant for out-of-pocket medical marijuana costs incurred as reasonable and necessary treatment for a work-related injury. The court reversed the Workers' Compensation Board's denial of the portion of claimant's review medical petition to treatment and/or billing that sought such reimbursement.
Publication Date: 2023-04-03
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Middle
Judge: District Judge Kane
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1:21-cv-00183
Defendant moved for summary judgment in employee's action asserting hostile work environment, sexual harassment, sexual discrimination and retaliation under title VII and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act and court found sovereign immunity barred plaintiff's PHRA claims, her title VII hostile environment sexual harassment and discrimination claims were untimely and plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of title VII retaliation. Motion granted.
Publication Date: 2023-04-03
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Insurance
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Western
Judge: District Judge Kelly
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-1468
Defendants moved for summary judgment in plaintiff's wrongful termination action and court found plaintiff failed to support his False Claims Act claim, his retaliation and gender discrimination claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Title VII, Pennsylvania Human Relations Act and Equal Pay Act but did establish a prima facie showing for his Sarbanes-Oxley Act whistleblower retaliation claims and his ADEA and PHRA age discrimination claims. Motion granted in part and denied in part.
Publication Date: 2023-03-27
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Agriculture | Manufacturing | Transportation
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Western
Judge: District Judge Stickman
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2:22-cv-1164
Plaintiffs had alleged viable overtime compensation claims by pleading sufficient facts to demonstrate they were misclassified as independent contractors and that defendants had liability as a single employer/joint employers. Defendants' motion to dismiss denied.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read