• Xie v. Xie

    Publication Date: 2024-05-10
    Practice Area: Real Estate
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Monroe County
    Judge: Judge Williamson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 004957-CV-2015

    Plaintiff sought partition of real property that she owned with defendant. The court ordered the property partitioned, calculated the amounts owed between the parties in light of credits based upon amounts paid and the property's fair rental value for pertinent periods, and set out proper disbursement amounts for any sale proceeds, depending upon the parties' intentions for the property's final disposition.

  • MJ Byeich Prop., LLC v. JJL Normandy Prop., LLC

    Publication Date: 2024-05-10
    Practice Area: Real Estate
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
    Judge: Judge Mellon
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 2021-02831

    The court's §1925(a) opinion urged affirmance of its Oct. 11, 2023 order denying post-trial relief and its October 17, 2023 order and judgment in favor of plaintiff whose vacant commercial lot was subject to a deliberate water intrusion by defendants from their adjacent property which was uphill to the plaintiff's property.

  • Griffin v. Mathis

    Publication Date: 2024-05-10
    Practice Area: Real Estate
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
    Judge: Judge Fox
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 190 EDA 2024

    The court urged the Superior Court to affirm its order that ruled on exceptions to a Master's Report that determined the fair market value of a residence owned by the parties and other issues that were not appealable as a final order.

  • Maple v. Moses

    Publication Date: 2024-05-03
    Practice Area: Real Estate
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Monroe County
    Judge: Judge Higgins
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 3351 CV 2022

    The court denied plaintiff's motion to amend the court's order appointing a master to oversee the private sale of a lot owned by the unmarried parties as tenants in common and encumbered by a mortgage after plaintiff filed a complaint for partition of the real estate. Pa. R. Civ. P 1563 provides that property not capable of division shall be offered for private sale confined to the parties.

  • Willis v. Schuylkill County Tax Claim Bureau

    Publication Date: 2024-04-19
    Practice Area: Real Estate
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: Commonwealth Court
    Judge: Judge Ceisler
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 229 C.D. 2023

    The court reversed the trial court's order overruling appellants' objections to the upset sale of real property and found that appellee Schuylkill County Tax Claim Bureau failed to comply with the notice requirements in §602 of the Real Estate Tax Sale Law because appellee failed to comply with §607.1(a) of RETSL that required appellee to make additional efforts to notify appellants of the upset sale beyond those in §602.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    New Jersey Estate Litigation 2014

    Authors: Michael R. Griffinger, Paul F. Cullum III

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • DiSalvatore v. Hendry

    Publication Date: 2024-04-05
    Practice Area: Real Estate
    Industry: Real Estate
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
    Judge: Judge Motto
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 10945 OF 2014, C.A.

    Defendant property owners moved for summary judgment asserting plaintiff was prohibited from receiving title to the property which was sold at a judicial tax sale. Motion granted.

  • Walsh v. Lopez

    Publication Date: 2024-04-05
    Practice Area: Real Estate
    Industry: Real Estate
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
    Judge: Judge Keogh
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 00882

    Defendant appealed the court's order quieting title in a residence in favor of plaintiff. The court requested that its order be affirmed where plaintiff's failure to file post-trial motions resulted in a waiver of all of her appellate issues.

  • Pena v. Colomban

    Publication Date: 2024-04-05
    Practice Area: Real Estate
    Industry: Real Estate
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Monroe County
    Judge: Judge Williamson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 1010 CIVIL 2022

    The parties cross moved for summary judgment in an action resulting from a home sale. The court granted plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on one count of defendant's counterclaim and denied defendant's motion for summary judgment.

  • Matthew 2535 Prop., LLC v. Denithorne

    Publication Date: 2024-03-29
    Practice Area: Real Estate
    Industry: Food and Beverage | Hospitality and Lodging | Real Estate
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Kunselman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 285 EDA 2022

    Sellers challenged equity court's order of specific performance of a real estate contract for the stated price minus insurance proceeds after the building was destroyed by fire before closing and court found the record was devoid of any competent evidence regarding the post-fire value of the property and the only equitable result was a new trial on the amount of the purchase price buyer owed sellers. Vacated and remanded.

  • Anders v. Water Gap Acquisitions Partners, LLC

    Publication Date: 2024-03-29
    Practice Area: Real Estate
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Monroe County
    Judge: Judge Williamson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 3376 CIVIL 2022

    Defendants sought summary judgment in plaintiff's action seeking injunctive and compensatory relief regarding defendants' fence. The court granted defendants' motion as to plaintiff's claims sounding in private nuisance where all evidence regarding the physical characteristics of defendants' fence indicated it was lawfully constructed, and plaintiff could not show the requisite "significant harm" on his assertion of private nuisance.