In a ruling that clears the way for a copyright plaintiff to collect on a judgment of more than $30 million, a federal judge has refused to grant a stay to allow the defendant to seek review by the U.S. Supreme Court.
July 07, 2011 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
In a ruling that clears the way for a copyright plaintiff to collect on a judgment of more than $30 million, a federal judge has refused to grant a stay to allow the defendant to seek review by the U.S. Supreme Court.
In his six-page opinion in Graham Co. v. Haughey , U.S. District Judge Harvey Bartle III found that the district court "lacks jurisdiction to issue a stay of a judgment of the court of appeals pending the filing of a certiorari petition."
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
