It is unsurprising that, in a profession already known for risk aversion, the rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has been met with some resistance and calls for caution. In perhaps the most famous tale, a lawyer in New York made headlines last year for filing a brief replete with citations to fictitious cases, the unfortunate result of having posed legal research questions to ChatGPT and then inappropriately taking its answers at face value. Stories like this have led to a flurry of ongoing commentary alerting lawyers to the limits of AI.