The trial court sided with the plaintiff, holding that the signature of a policy's first named insured alone was not enough to execute a waiver of stacked coverage, and that the insurer must provide each named insurer the chance to waive stacked coverage.
August 08, 2023 at 02:55 PM
3 minute read
Litigation Reporter
The Pennsylvania Superior Court on Monday threw out a trial court’s judgment allowing a woman to collect stacked uninsured motorist coverage despite her husband having waived stacking benefits.
In its precedential opinion, a three-judge panel rejected the plaintiff’s argument that Erie Insurance Exchange failed to present her with an opportunity to stack uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Credit: Rawpixel.com/Shutterstock
