In early February, the city of Philadelphia was truly bleeding green. As the Philadelphia Eagles, the true heart and soul of this blue-collar town, prepared to play the Kansas City Chiefs in the Super Bowl, they were also involved in two disputes off the field. These other disputes, however, had nothing to do with defensive or offensive schemes on the field, but in the courtroom. The disputes involved two former players who suffered career-ending injuries. However, one case was tried through the workers’ compensation process and the other through a civil jury trial. While the workers’ compensation case resulted in a small windfall of under $100,000, the medical malpractice claim resulted in a $43.5 million verdict for the player.

So why the discrepancy in awards? Why was one case a workers’ compensation claim and one a medical malpractice claim? The two cases, decided only 10 days apart, provide us with a unique chance to look at how workers’ compensation plays out in professional sports and why, for players who are paid so well, it is the least desirable route to recovery.