Hartford had argued that the breakdown of the settlement, with 60% going to the spouse, was a "ploy" that would allow the plaintiffs to hold onto more of the settlement by circumventing the carrier's the workers compensation subrogation lien.
August 30, 2022 at 05:57 PM
4 minute read
Bureau Chief
Editor’s note: This story has been updated to make clear that the settlement was between the plaintiff and a third party, rather than between the plaintiff and Hartford Insurance Group.
A workers’ compensation insurance carrier was unable to undo a $1.4 million third-party settlement settlement, despite arguments that it wasn’t given a full hearing to contest the breakdown of the accord, the Pennsylvania Superior Court has ruled.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
McCarter & English, LLP, a well established and growing law firm, is actively seeking a talented and driven associate having 2-5 years o...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
(Credit: Andrey_Popov/Shutterstock)
