“Just because the PureZero products physically functioned does not mean they were the all-natural products Ms. Binakonsky believed she was purchasing," Ranjan said.
July 22, 2022 at 05:53 PM
5 minute read
A Pennsylvania woman’s lawsuit claiming a haircare line contained false advertising for its supposedly “natural” ingredients can partially continue, a federal judge has ruled.
Plaintiff Rachel Binakonsky filed a class action suit against JM Brands LLC in April 2021, claiming that the company and its Purezero haircare line violated the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, breached express and implied warranty and committed unjust enrichment.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an associate to joins its Commercial Litigation practice in our Columbus or Cincinnati offices. Ca...
Job Opportunity: Location: Prestigious Florida Law Firm seeks to hire a Business attorney with at least 5 years of experience for their Ft. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
