While some court systems suspended their procurement rules to quickly implement videoconferencing tech during the pandemic, in others, judges were left to take matters into their own hands.
March 10, 2021 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
Reporter
The original version of this story was published on Legaltech News
Some judges know firsthand the price of courtroom innovation—because they paid for it out of their own pockets.
As COVID-19 infections and lockdowns spread in the U.S., the demand for digital access outpaced some court systems’ ability to license videoconferencing software, leaving some judges footing the bill for their chambers’ videoconferencing subscriptions.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Credit: apichon_tee/stock.adobe.com
