Photo: Shutterstock
"The problem with plaintiffs’ argument is that it wrongly assumes the burden is on defendants to provide enough information to prove their document search was reasonable," U.S. District Judge Berle Schiller of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania said.
June 30, 2020 at 03:29 PM
1 minute read
A federal judge has denied a request by retailers Winn-Dixie and Bi-Lo for additional discovery in the mushroom price-fixing antitrust litigation.
U.S. District Judge Berle Schiller of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania’s ruling relates to the plaintiffs’ request for the defendants—members of the Eastern Mushroom Marketing Cooperative—to produce documents on mushroom sales. Schiller granted leave for the plaintiffs to refile.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
