Photo: Andrii Spy_k/Shutterstock.com
In a recently filed memorandum, Blank Rome contended that the use of periods and bullet points in the contract the two parties entered into clearly indicates that it is entitled to a flat 10% of the total increase it obtained for the mass tort firm.
April 10, 2020 at 04:33 PM
1 minute read
Bureau Chief
The dispute between Blank Rome and mass tort law firm Andrus Wagstaff over nearly $500,000 in fees may hinge on punctuation.
The two firms are in a dispute over how much Colorado-based Andrus Wagstaff owes Philadelphia-based Blank Rome for helping the mass tort firm increase its common benefit compensation from the transvaginal mesh litigation.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
