The Pennsylvania Supreme Court appears poised to decide whether an attorney’s continued representation of a client following an alleged occurrence of legal malpractice should toll the statute of limitations for bringing a malpractice claim.

In a one-page order Jan. 28, the justices granted allocatur in Clark v. Stover, agreeing to review an August 2019 decision by a unanimous three-judge state Superior Court panel that dismissed as untimely a legal malpractice case against Centre County attorney Jeffrey Stover.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]