Photo: Shutterstock
The case stemmed from a grievance the union filed protesting an employee's termination, and the Commonwealth Court's ruling dealt with whether the county had the ability to appeal the arbitrator's holding that it had jurisdiction over the matter.
July 11, 2019 at 01:30 PM
1 minute read
Bureau Chief
Luzerne County acted prematurely when it appealed a determination that a grievance filed by the union representing the county’s assistant district attorneys needed to be arbitrated, the Commonwealth Court has ruled.
The unanimous decision from an expanded seven-judge panel sent the case, Luzerne County v. Teamsters Local 401, back for a full decision by the arbitrator.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
