Sands Casino Denied Access to Social Media Accounts in Slip-and-Fall Case
"In the Facebook posts and in the portion of Mrs. Allen's deposition relied upon by defendant in support of their motion, there is nothing to suggest the unreliability of Mrs. Allen's claims with respect to the nature and scope of her injury, as none of the activities referenced show or suggest the strenuous use of her right shoulder," Judge Craig Dally said.
August 09, 2018 at 12:37 PM
3 minute read
The Sands Bethlehem Casino is out of luck in its bid to access a woman's social media accounts to seek evidence that she was not as badly hurt from a slip-and-fall in the casino as she claimed.
Northampton Court of Common Pleas Judge Craig Dally denied Sands' motion to compel plaintiff Catrina Allen's username and password information for her Facebook, Twitter and Instagram accounts.
Allen claimed that a right shoulder injury sustained in the casino fall impaired her ability to do multiple activities. Sands sought to refute her story by getting hold of social media posts showing Allen engaged in the activities she said she couldn't perform.
Sands claimed the evidence was relevant for damages purposes and for impeaching Allen's credibility. Allen—who testified that, since the accident, she has not visited family, gone to the movies, bowled, or gone to the park with her children—said the posts at issue were consistent with her claims.
Ultimately, Dally said Sands was off point; a photo of Allen attending a baseball game or visiting family doesn't mean she was performing strenuous activity she claimed she was unable to do.
“It is not Mrs. Allen's contention that she has been rendered unable to engage in all the activities of daily living,” Dally said. “Rather, she claims that her activities of daily living have been limited by a right shoulder injury.”
The judge continued, “In the Facebook posts and in the portion of Mrs. Allen's deposition relied upon by defendant in support of their motion, there is nothing to suggest the unreliability of Mrs. Allen's claims with respect to the nature and scope of her injury, as none of the activities referenced show or suggest the strenuous use of her right shoulder.”
Dally acknowledged a difference between Allen's deposition testimony and what was on Facebook, but said her legal claims held firm.
“While Mrs. Allen's public Facebook posts controvert her deposition testimony, it cannot be said that they controvert her legal claims,” Dally said. “Accordingly, the court finds that defendant has failed to establish the relevancy prong of the portion of their request addressed to discovery of Mrs. Allen's Facebook account.”
“Moreover,” he added, “defendant has made absolutely no attempt to establish a factual predicate in support of their request for access to her Twitter and Instagram accounts. Accordingly their discovery request is denied in its entirety.”
Robert J. Balch of Post & Schell represents Sands and declined to comment.
Anthony Baratta of Baratta, Russell & Baratta represents Allen and did not respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMany Lawyers Are Reeling From Election Results, but Leaders Are Staying Mum
6 minute read3rd Circuit Revives Class Action Against Bayer Over Benzene-Contaminated Products
4 minute readPeople in the News—Nov. 11, 2024—Pietragallo Gordon, Rawle & Henderson
3 minute readSlip-and-Fall Suit Cleared to Proceed Against Kalahari Indoor Waterpark
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Brown Rudnick Picks Up Bochner Patent Trial Team in Houston
- 2HSF's American Dream: What Will a U.S. Merger Mean For its Asia Practice?
- 3Kirkland Tech Transactions Partner Heads to Polsinelli
- 4A Government Lawyer's Tough Day at the Supreme Court
- 5Big Law Expected To Follow Milbank's Lead With Associate Year-End Bonuses
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250