Filter This View

  • In Re Xerox Corporation

    Publication Date: 2018-07-02
    Practice Area: Administrative Law | Civil Procedure
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Guzman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 16-0671

    Texas sued Xerox under the Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act, alleging that, while it was administering the Texas Medicaid program, Xerox misrepresented, concealed or failed to disclose certain material facts.

  • Anderson v. Durant

    Publication Date: 2018-07-02
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Guzman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 16-0842

    Anderson sued Durant, who owned several automobile dealerships, alleging Durant breached an oral promise to give Anderson an interest in two dealerships, and then defamed Anderson after terminating his employment.

  • Larry Bos v. Smith

    Publication Date: 2018-06-18
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Guzman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 16-0341

    Craig Smith was married to Trisha Bos, the daughter of Larry and Mary Bos, and that marriage produced two children.

  • Jody James Farms v. The Altman Group

    Publication Date: 2018-05-21
    Practice Area: Dispute Resolution | Insurance Litigation
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Guzman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 17-0062

    Jody James Farms, JV purchased a Crop Revenue Coverage Insurance Policy from Rain & Hail, LLC through Altman Group, an independent insurance agency.

  • Alamo Heights v. Clark

    Publication Date: 2018-04-16
    Practice Area: Employment Litigation
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Guzman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 16-0244

    After Alamo Heights terminated the employment of Clark, a coach and physical education teacher, she sued, asserting sexual-harassment and retaliation claims under the Texas Commission of Human Rights Act.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Library of Pennsylvania Family Law Forms, Fourth Edition

    Authors: Joseph S. Britton

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Jefferson State Bank v. Lenk

    Publication Date: 2010-08-31
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-08-27
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Justice Guzman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 09-0269

    Argued February 16, 2010Section 4.406 of the Texas Business and Commerce Code requires customers to timely notify their banks of unauthorized transactions. Today, we decide when that duty arises fo

  • Presidio Independent School District v. Scott

    Publication Date: 2010-04-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-04-23
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Justice Guzman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 08-0958

    Argued January 19, 2010At issue in this case is whether Texas Education Code § 21.307 requires the Commissioner of Education's consent before an appeal of his decision in a dispute between a t

  • Hancock v. Variyam

    Publication Date: 2013-05-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-05-17
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Justice Guzman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 11-0772

    Argued December 5, 2012JUSTICE GUZMAN delivered the opinion of the Court.In this defamation suit involving two physicians, we clarify a longstanding distinction between defamati

  • Kopplow Development Inc. v. City of San Antonio

    Publication Date: 2013-03-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-03-08
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Justice Guzman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 11-0104

    Argued September 13, 2012JUSTICE GUZMAN delivered the opinion of the Court.In this case we determine whether an inverse condemnation claim is premature when premised on the owne