A gentlemen’s club owner convinced a federal appeals court panel in Texas that a group of exotic dancers should be stripped of their collective action in a wage dispute.

The appeals court action was contrary to a denial it made on an identical motion in the same case and was based on arbitration agreements that the gentlemen’s club defendants didn’t even compel, a point that was emphasized in a dissenting opinion.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]