Ex-Inmate Sues Texas Defense Attorneys After Pleading Guilty on Voided Criminal Statute
A former Texas prison inmate has filed a legal malpractice case against his former criminal defense attorneys, claiming he spent nearly two years in…
September 04, 2018 at 03:31 PM
4 minute read
A former Texas prison inmate has filed a legal malpractice case against his former criminal defense attorneys, claiming he spent nearly two years in a penitentiary because of the bad legal advice.
Plaintiff Colton Lester recently filed a lawsuit in an East Texas district court seeking more than $1 million in damages against Nacogdoches attorney Seth Johnson and Onalaska attorney Cecil Berg, alleging he was wrongfully imprisoned because of their gross negligence.
According to his petition, Lester was charged with attempted online solicitation of a minor in 2014, when he was 17 years old. The nature of the conduct leading up to the charge is not detailed in the petition.
That year he hired Johnson to represent him. Johnson told Lester he was a criminal law specialist and, after investigating the matter, advised him to plead guilty. Johnson negotiated a deal with prosecutors that placed Lester on deferred adjudication probation for five years.
In 2016, a motion to revoke Lester's probation was filed, and Berg represented him in a probation revocation hearing, which resulted in Lester being sentenced to three years in the Texas Department of Corrections.
However, in 2017, Lester was contacted by the State Counsel for Offenders, who informed him for the first time that the statute upon which he was convicted was void prior to his offense date. In 2013, the Court of Criminal Appeals had ruled in Ex Parte Lo that section 33.021(b) of the Texas Penal Code—the law that established online solicitation of a minor as a felony—was unconstitutional as vague and overly broad. Lester's conviction was ultimately vacated by the CCA in 2018, according to the petition.
“Unbelievably, and most egregiously, defendants failed to disclose to Lester that the statute under which he was charged was void and non-existent,” the petition alleges.
“Thus, due to defendants' negligence, gross negligence and breach of fiduciary duty, Lester lost his freedom at the tender age of 19 and was forced to endure almost two years of prison time for allegedly committing a crime that did not exist,” the petition continued. “Lester was thrown in prison at a time in his life when his friends and others his age were entering college and/or planning for their future in the world. Needless to say, Lester has suffered severe emotional distress due to the gross misconduct of defendants and lost time that can never be returned to him.”
Johnson declined to comment, and Berg did not return a call for comment.
David Kassab, a Houston legal malpractice attorney who represents Lester, alleges that Johnson and Berg “messed up and they need to be held accountable like any other professional.”
Kassab noted that legal malpractice cases against criminal defense attorneys are rare in Texas because of the Peeler Doctrine—a rule derived from the 1995 Texas Supreme Court decision in Peeler v. Hughes & Luce, which held that a person convicted of a crime cannot sue his criminal defense attorney for legal malpractice unless he has been exonerated by an appellate court.
“Not many cases come across our desk where the client has been exonerated, which is rare in Texas because you have to prove that you've been exonerated to sue your lawyer,” Kassab said. “You can literally sleep through the entire trial, and unless the client was exonerated, there is not much the client can do about it.''
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCrypto Entrepreneur Claims Justice Department’s Software Crackdown Violates US Constitution
4 minute readVinson & Elkins Expands Environmental Team with Chair of Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
4 minute readSupreme Court Appears Sympathetic to Law Requiring Porn Sites to Verify Users' Age
Trending Stories
- 1Walt Disney, IBM Denied High Court Review of Old NY Franchise Tax Law
- 2The Right Amount?: Federal Judge Weighs $1.8M Attorney Fee Request with Strip Club's $15K Award
- 3Is 1st Circuit the New Center for Trump Policy Challenges?
- 4Justices Grill US Government in Venue Dispute Over FDA Vape Challenges
- 5Change Is Coming With the New Trump Era. For Big Law, Change Is Already Here
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250