By Avalon Zoppo | Brad Kutner | March 7, 2023
The U.S. Supreme Court will hear an admiralty dispute involving choice-of-law clauses in maritime contracts according to Monday's orders list.
By Avalon Zoppo | January 9, 2023
The justices were back on the bench Monday tackling hefty attorney-client privilege questions, and we asked a couple legal experts for their thoughts on how the arguments went.
By Marcia Coyle | November 1, 2022
The justices end their first week of the November argument session with a case involving the Bank Secrecy Act, pitting business against government and whistleblower interests.
By Marcia Coyle | November 30, 2020
Welcome to Supreme Court Brief, and happy Monday. The justices are back on the telephone lines today, and we've got a snap item on one of the two cases being argued today. Plus, a former Thomas clerk will make his debut. Thanks for reading!
By Tony Mauro | Marcia Coyle | August 22, 2018
Some new thinking about the number of U.S. Supreme Courts, as we expect to see this term a particularly large number. Plus: a new Supreme Court blog presents empirical research: including a new post on which justice is the most polite. Thanks for reading Supreme Court Brief.
By Marcia Coyle | June 21, 2018
“Stock isn't money; stock is stock,” intoned Justice Neil Gorsuch in his summary from the bench of his majority opinion in Wisconsin Central v. United States.
By Tony Mauro | Marcia Coyle | June 21, 2018
The U.S. Supreme Court says states are allowed to collect sales taxes from online retailers that don't have a have a physical presence in their borders. By a 5-4 vote in the case South Dakota v. Wayfair, the majority overturned the court's 1992 decision in Quill v. North Dakota, which had affirmed the “physical presence” test for state sales-and-use tax collections.
By Marcia Coyle | April 17, 2018
"I'm concerned about the many unanswered questions that overturning precedents will create," Justice Sonia Sotomayor said at one point during the argument Tuesday.
By Tony Mauro | March 16, 2018
"We built the case from the ground up," Goldstein & Russell founder Tom Goldstein said at a Georgetown University Law Center panel discussion. "We designed the legislation. Got the legislation passed. We went into court. We told the courts that 'hello, we want to lose.'"
By Marcia Coyle | January 12, 2018
A victory for the state could open a potential multibillion-dollar source of revenue for the states.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS