The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling Monday cutting off royalties for the developer of a Spider-Man toy may be a boon to the patent bar, but a blow to “garage inventors” who don’t know the intricacies of patent licensing agreements.

By a 6-3 vote, the court in Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment ruled that the inventor of a Spider-Man web-shooting toy is not entitled to royalties for use of the patent after it expired.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]