Lawyers for AT&T told a federal judge Tuesday that the government’s antitrust lawsuit challenging the company’s merger with Time Warner lacks any meaningful allegations.

DOJ sued the telecommunications giant last week, claiming its vertical merger with Time Warner, which produces television content, would harm consumers because AT&T would be able to “hinder” its rivals by forcing them to pay more for Time Warner’s channels, which include HBO and CNN. In a fierce reply Tuesday, AT&T argued their proposed deal poses “absolutely no risk of harm to competition or consumers.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]