This week on’s Unprecedented podcast we talk with Nathan Wessler, a staff attorney with the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. Wessler will be arguing against the Department of Justice on Wednesday at the U.S. Supreme Court in Carpenter v. U.S. The case centers on whether the government, in conducting criminal investigations, should need a warrant to obtain a suspect’s cell-site location data covering long periods of time.

Wessler explains the ACLU’s argument that the “third-party doctrine” doesn’t apply, the role of the Stored Communications Act in the case, and what he sees as at stake for both companies and individuals. “Our primary argument to the court in this case is that nobody has ever expected that police would have access to this kind of historical map of everywhere someone’s gone over days and weeks and months, and that the Fourth Amendment should have something to say about that,” Wessler says.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]