Sentence Reduction Denied for Failure to Show Extraordinary, Compelling Circumstances

The parties' dispute centered on an exclusivity agreement from 2011, under which defendant was to manufacture certain products exclusively for PilePro.

Appellant was convicted by a jury in four cases of aggravated robbery and, in one case, burglary of a habitation with intent to commit robbery and impersonating a public servant.

Appellant restaurant appealed the grant of a new trial on damages in appellee's slip and fall case and court reversed trial court's grant of a new trial on damages and remanded for the court's consideration of appellee's claim that the jury's $1,000 verdict was against the weight of the evidence. Order reversed.

Transfer Order Affirmed in Action Alleging Tortious Interference with a Contract

Court affirms dismissal of personal injury and premises liability lawsuit against Georgia Department of Natural Resources, citing sovereign immunity and discretionary functions exception