Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'quality'

You can use to get even better search results
January 03, 2005 |

Philadelphia Feels the Loss of Greatness, Young and Old

A trailblazer for female lawyers. One of the city's greatest trial lawyers. A prominent figure investigating the Watergate scandal. The first Asian-American judge east of California. Two of the city's most accomplished defense litigators. And a man who led Drinker Biddle & Reath for more than three decades.
12 minute read
Black v. M & W Gear Co.
Publication Date: 2001-11-12
Practice Area: damages | evidence | products liability
Industry:
Court: 10th Cir.
Judge: BRISCOE, MURPHY, Circuit Judges, and CROW, District Judge
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: Nos. 00-6072 and

The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. MURPHY, Circuit Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff brought a products liability suit against Defendants in the Un

Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. v. P.M. Video Corp.
Publication Date: 1999-06-11
Practice Area: business law
Industry:
Court: Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Judge: Judges Keefe, Eichen, and Coburn
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Herbert J. Stern
For defendant: Theodore V. Wells, Jr.
Case number: No. A-6440-96T2

The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. The opinion of the court was delivered byCOBURN, J.A.D. Plaintiff(1)/

McComish v. Bennett
Publication Date: 2010-05-21
Practice Area: Constitutional Law
Industry:
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Nicholas C. Dranias, Goldwater Institute, Phoeniz, Arizona, for the plaintiffs-appellees. William R. Maurer, Institute for Justice, Seattle, Washington, for the plaintiffs-intervenors-appellees.
For defendant: Mary R. O?Gracy, Solicitor General of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, for the defendants-appellants. Bradley S. Phillips, Munger, Tolles, & Olson, Los Angeles, California, for the defendant-intervenor-appellant. Stephen M. Hoersting, Center for Competitive Politics, Alexandria, Virginia, for amicus curiae Center for Competitive Politics.
Case number: No. 10-15165 No. 10-15166

Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 6164JOHN McCOMISH; NANCY McLAIN; TONY BOUIE, Plaintiffs-Appellees, ROBERT BURNS, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee, ARIZONA

Marsh USA Inc. v. Cook
Publication Date: 2011-06-28
Practice Area: Employment
Industry:
Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
Judge: Dale Wainwright Justice
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: NO. 09-0558

Argued September 16, 2010JUSTICE WAINWRIGHT delivered the opinion of the Court, in which JUSTICE HECHT, JUSTICE MEDINA, JUSTICE JOHNSON, and JUSTICE GUZMAN joined.JUSTICE WILLETT delivered

Hubbard v. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, 05 Civ. 4396
Publication Date: 2008-03-12
Practice Area: Employment
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
Judge: Paul Crotty
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 05 Civ. 4396

District Judge Paul A. Crotty U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Crotty Vivian Hubbard, an African-American female, and Pamela Ruiz-Mok,

Doleac v. Michalson
Publication Date: 2001-08-29
Practice Area: appeals: federal | litigation | torts
Industry:
Court: 5th Cir.
Judge: Rhesa Hawkins Barksdale
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 99-60754

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of MississippiFor this appeal, the threshold issue is our jurisdiction vel non to consider the district court's permitting an

October 25, 2004 |

State v. Harris

By repeatedly stating its belief that defendant's capital sentence would never be carried out, the post-conviction relief court demonstrated a diminished sense of responsibility, and its findings and conclusions are null and void; based on a de novo review of the PCR court's factual findings, its denial for relief is affirmed; additionally, it would violate due process to deprive a capital defendant of the opportunity to present expert testimony to support a bona fide claim of mental retardation.
51 minute read
August 10, 2005 |

King v. Fox

Circuit Seeks Guidance on State Fee Rules in Action Over Client�s Ratification of Unconscionable Fee Pact
40 minute read
Kuper v. Empire Blue Cross & Blue Shield
Publication Date: 2003-02-28
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

Judge Gwin KUPER v. EMPIRE BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD — On November 15, 2002, having lost its case to a jury, Defendant Empire Blue Cross & Blue Shield (“Empire”)

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources

    • Creating a Culture of Compliance

      Brought to you by Ironclad

      Download Now

    • A Buyer's Guide to Law Firm Software

      Brought to you by PracticePanther

      Download Now

    • A Step-by-Step Flight Plan for Legal Teams: Fire Up Your Productivity Engine and Deliver High-Impact Work Faster

      Brought to you by HaystackID

      Download Now

    • Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now