0 results for 'eBay'
Cybersquatting Suit Bears Fruit for Winery
For two years, Houston's Spider Webs bought "real estate" on the information superhighway, registering Internet domain names for $70 each, then selling to the highest bidder. But the company got tangled in its own web. A federal judge in Houston ordered Spider Webs to transfer ernestandjulio.com to E. & J. Gallo Winery and pay $25,000 in damages under the federal Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act.Consumer Protection Law 2007: Guide to Statutes
Thomas A. Dickerson, an associate justice of the Appellate Division, Second Department, reviews cases heard throughout New York in the past year involving auto repair shop labor charges, home equity loan mortgage closings, credit card misrepresentations, currency conversions, electricity charges, food expiration dates, home equity mortgage closings, tax advice and more.Securities specialist Joseph Allerhand is on the front lines of litigation spawned by the economic collapse. He discusses how Weil won the assignment to handle AIG's enormous docket, as well as challenges all securities class action defendants face in this climate.
After studying dozens of entries, the magazine selects the fifth firm to receive this honor for its litigation achievements. Five other firms were named as finalists.
Judge orders DLA Piper to give documents to Roger Clemens
Lawyers for Roger Clemens won access to information the law firm DLA Piper wanted to keep secret from the defense team on the ground the attorney work product doctrine shielded the documents from disclosure.For years, culminating with his Ninth Circuit win against UMG Recordings this week, Elkin has relied on a safe harbor provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act to fend off copyright infringement claims against his client Veoh Networks. Elkin's pioneering work has paid off for Veoh, and so far it's paying off for Google and YouTube as they defend against Viacom's $1 billion copyright suit.
Cite as: Upper East Lease Assoc. v. Cannon, 44409/09, NYLJ 1202479543867, at *1 (Dist. NA, Decided January 20, 2011)Judge Michael A. Ciaffap class="decided
Law Firm Set on Auto-Delete in E-Mail Discovery Dispute
Defending itself against a former employee's discrimination claim, Detroit-based Honigman and its firm vice-chair stand accused of failing to provide e-mails dating back more than 90 days from the effective date in a recent discovery request. The firm's stance has been it automatically archives and deletes all e-mails after 90 days and cannot retrieve them.Creating a Culture of Compliance
Brought to you by Ironclad
Download Now
A Buyer's Guide to Law Firm Software
Brought to you by PracticePanther
Download Now
A Step-by-Step Flight Plan for Legal Teams: Fire Up Your Productivity Engine and Deliver High-Impact Work Faster
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now
Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now