Appellant appealed the trial court's judgment of sentence on his conviction for driving under the influence-controlled substance and related crimes. The court affirmed, holding that expert testimony was not necessary to support appellant's conviction for DUI-controlled substance where a testifying trooper opined that appellant was under the influence based upon his observations, the outcome of field sobriety testing, and the officer's training and experience.

Alice Chu appealed her conviction.

Court remanded appeal of vehicle safety inspection licenses where trial court made new factual findings that could support modifying DOT's penalty and where the trial court failed to expressly find whether misrepresentations on inspection form were fraudulent or simply the product of carelessness. Orders of the trial court vacated, case remanded.

Product liability plaintiffs appealed the court's order denying their motion for post-trial relief. The court held that it properly limited or struck testimony by two of plaintiffs' experts where one expert relied upon a statistical analysis of a non-testifying colleague and the other provided a supplemental opinion report a mere month before trial.

Court affirms order terminating a mother's parental rights to her two children based on evidence of abandonment, failure of support, and lack of parental care and control

Yellowstone Injunction Upheld Despite Case Appearing as Non-Payment Action

Russell v. NYU