Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Zoom Video Communications'

You can use to get even better search results
Tannerite Sports v. NBCUniversal News, 15-3485-cv
Publication Date: 2017-07-27
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Jacobs, Pooler, C.JJ., and Crawford,2 D.J.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Appearing for Appellant: David L. Cargille, Baer Crossey McDemus, LLC, Philadelphia, PA. Robert Jackel, Philadelphia, PA.
For defendant: Appearing for Appellee: Daniel M. Kummer, Chelley E. Talbert, Andrew D. Jacobs, NBC Universal Media, LLC, New York, NY.
Case number: 15-3485-cv

Rejection of Defamation Suit Against NBC Is

February 06, 2015 |

Amazon Digs In Against ECommerce NPE

In a case so technical the judge wants back-up, Amazon's lawyers argue several patents for an ecommerce "traffic control system" describe an outcome but no underlying mechanism.
8 minute read
February 06, 2015 | Law.com

Amazon Digs In Against ECommerce NPE

In a case so technical the judge wants back-up, Amazon's lawyers argue several patents for an ecommerce "traffic control system" describe an outcome but no underlying mechanism.
8 minute read
Ex parte RONALD THOMPSON, Appellant
Publication Date: 2014-12-17
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Judge: KELLER
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: PD-1371-13

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXASEx parte RONALD THOMPSON, AppellantNO. PD-13

People v. Alvarez
Publication Date: 2014-09-11
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: C.A. 4th
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Tony Raukauckas, District Attorney and Anna M. Chinowth, Deputy District Attorney for Plaintiff and Appellant.
For defendant: Susan S. Bauguess, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Respondent Daniel Alvarez, Jr.
Case number: No. G048425

Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 10717 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DANIEL ALVAREZ, JR., e

Law Journal Press | Digital Book Communications Law and Practice Authors: Stuart N. Brotman View this Book

View more book results for the query "Zoom Video Communications"

February 28, 2014 |

Key Discovery and Litigation Support Developments Unveiled at LTNY 2014

While e-discovery vendors did not introduce a watershed of new legal technology at LegalTech New York, two major trends continued from 2013.
8 minute read
People v. Carlos Becker, 2012/13
Publication Date: 2013-12-23
Practice Area: Criminal Practice
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, Bronx County, Part 60
Judge: Justice Steven Barrett
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: District Attorney: Osman Abbasi, Assistant District Attorney, Office of the Bronx County.
For defendant: For the defendant: Stuart London.
Case number: 2012/13

Cite as: People v. Carlos Becker, 2012/13, NYLJ 1202633990493, at *1 (Sup. BX, Decided November 3, 2013) 2012/13 Justice Steven Barrettp clas

The People v. Ralph Labarbera, 0672/07
Publication Date: 2013-07-26
Practice Area: Criminal Practice
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, New York County, Part 31
Judge: Acting Justice Jill Konviser, J.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 0672/07

Cite as: The People v. Ralph Labarbera, 0672/07, NYLJ 1202612574615, at *1 (Sup., NY, Decided July 24, 2013) 0672/07 Acting Justice Jill Konviser

USA v. Michael Murphy, 8:10-CR-312
Publication Date: 2012-12-07
Practice Area: Criminal Practice
Industry:
Court: U. S. District Court, Northern District
Judge: District Judge David Hurd
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorneys for the United States of America: Daniel C. Gardner, Esq., of Counsel, United States Attorney-Plattsburgh Office, Plattsburgh, NY.
For defendant: Attorneys for Defendant Murphy: Kevin A. Luibrand, Esq., of Counsel, Luibrand Law Firm, PLLC, Latham, NY. Attorneys for Defendant Webster: Timothy E. Austin, Esq., of Counsel, Office of The Federal Public Defender-Albany Office.
Case number: 8:10-CR-312

Cite as: USA v. Michael Murphy, 8:10-CR-312, NYLJ 1202580557213, at *1 (NDNY, Decided April 19, 2011)District Judge David HurdDecid

August 30, 2006 |

Patents Are Becoming Crucial to Video Games

For video game developers, publishers and investors, the most important asset is the intellectual property rights they own or control in the game. It is a common complaint that the patent system is broken and should be scrapped, but the video game industry must contend with the reality that the law currently recognizes the patentability of software, business and gameplay method patents, advises Kaye Scholer IP attorney Gregory P. Silberman, who favors gaming patents.
11 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources