Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Young Conaway Stargatt'

You can use to get even better search results
May 01, 2023 | Delaware Law Weekly

Morris James Bankruptcy and Restructuring Group Welcomes Two Attorneys

Morris James recently welcomed Siena Cerra and Tara Pakrouh as attorneys within the firm's bankruptcy and restructuring practice group.
1 minute read
April 27, 2023 | Law.com

Higher Law: SAFE Banking Returns | Veteran Cannabis Attorneys Size Up Legal Practice's Growth | Big-Name Patent Suit Verdict Affirmed | Delaware Goes Rec-Use Legal

Will 2023 finally be the year that legislation making banking services widely available to the cannabis industry makes it to the U.S. Senate floor?
8 minute read
April 24, 2023 | Delaware Law Weekly

Young Conaway Del. Partner Elected Fellow of the American Bar Foundation

Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor announced that Delaware partner Timothy E. Lengkeek has been elected by the board as a fellow of the American Bar Foundation.
1 minute read
April 04, 2023 | Delaware Law Weekly

Young Conaway Partner to Speak at Delaware Law Update

Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor corporate litigation and counseling partner Rolin P. Bissell is scheduled to be participating in the Delaware Law Update as part of the 2023 Weinberg Distinguished Speaker Series.
1 minute read
Takadu LTD., v. Innovyze, LLC
Publication Date: 2023-04-04
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Software | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Stephen B. Brauerman, Ronald P. Golden III, Bayard, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Robert P. Feinland, Jason J. Poulos, Meister Seelig & Fein LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
For defendant: Anne S. Gaza, Samantha G. Wilson, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael A. Jacobs, Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA; Kyle Mooney, Kyle D. Friedland, Morrison & Foerster LLP, New York, NY for defendant.
Case number: 21-291-RGA

The court ordered the parties to submit a proposed order consistent with the court's ruling on several disputed claim construction terms at issue in a patent litigation matter.

Law Journal Press | Digital Book Connecticut Foreclosures: An Attorney’s Manual of Practice and Procedure 2024 Authors: Denis R. Caron, Geoffrey K. Milne, Andrew P. Barsom View this Book

View more book results for the query "Young Conaway Stargatt"

April 03, 2023 | Delaware Business Court Insider

Hacked Crypto Company Hit With RICO Class Action

This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.
1 minute read
March 02, 2023 | Delaware Business Court Insider

FTX Attorneys' Billing Far Outpaces Hourly Rates Seen in 2008 Mega Bankruptcies

The largest segment by far is the $25.1 million billed by FTX lead counsel Sullivan & Cromwell across two filings.
4 minute read
March 02, 2023 | Delaware Law Weekly

Billings for FTX Attorneys Far Outpace Hourly Rates Seen in 2008 Mega Bankruptcies

The largest segment by far is the $25.1 million billed by FTX lead counsel Sullivan & Cromwell across two filings.
4 minute read
Malkani v. Cunningham
Publication Date: 2023-02-21
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Health Care | Investments and Investment Advisory | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Philip Trainer, Jr., Marie M. Degnan, Randall J. Teti, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; Marcos D. Jimenez, Marcos D. Jimenez, P.A., Miami, FL for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Ryan P. Newell, Lakshmi A. Muthu, Tara C. Pakrouh, Michael A. Carbonara, Jr., Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael C. Heyden, Jr., Joseph E. Brenner, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case number: 2020-1004-SG

Parties had reached valid and enforceable contract where plaintiff met his performance obligation under the contract and his request for ancillary documents was not material to the parties' agreement as plaintiff continued to perform.

Malkani v. Cunningham
Publication Date: 2023-02-14
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Philip Trainer, Jr., Marie M. Degnan, Randall J. Teti, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; Marcos D. Jimenez, Marcos D. Jimenez, P.A., Miami, FL for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Ryan P. Newell, Lakshmi A. Muthu, Tara C. Pakrouh, Michael A. Carbonara, Jr., Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael C. Heyden, Jr., Joseph E. Brenner, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case number: 2020-1004-SG

Parties' written investment contract was valid and enforceable where investor did not expressly reject the contract and the parties' subsequent actions demonstrated their intent to be bound to the contract and their belief that the contract contained all material terms of their deal.

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now

    • Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World

      Brought to you by LexisNexis®

      Download Now