Decided and Entered: July 15, 2004 12976 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v JORGE MARTINEZ, Also Known as GEORGE MARTINEZ, Also Known as WILLIAM JO

Four law firms that submitted a "grossly inflated" $2.7 million fee request after winning $12,500 for their client should go away empty-handed, a judge has ruled. U.S. District Court Joanna Seybert condemned the fee application submitted by real estate investor Robert Toussie's attorneys, including $2.65 million for Chadbourne & Parke, as "outrageously excessive" and done in "bad faith."

Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 9856 ADVERTISE.COM, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AOL ADVERTISING, INC., FKA Platform-A, In

The odds of a surprise turnaround for the banks fighting the Federal Housing Finance Agency are looking slimmer and slimmer.

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: July 29, 2010 102598 THE PEOPLE

Greenberg Traurig and Quarles & Brady have agreed to fork over a combined $87.5 million to resolve claims that they failed to put the brakes on a $900 million Ponzi scheme carried out by two mortgage-industry clients.

Cite as: USA v. Lawrence Dicristina, 11-CR-414, NYLJ 1202568450506, at *1 (EDNY, Decided August 21, 2012)District Judge Jack B. Wei

The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. BEEZER, Circuit Judge:Plaintiffs are engaged in the commercial recording, distribution and sale ofcopyrighted musi